Hotel Murah di Pangandaran - The housemaid service user (PRT) in Surabaya and its surrounding claims dealt worried about Bill (the Bill) PRT. They consider some of the articles in the Bill should be sharpened and more precise in the photographing condition of society.
Pesan Hotel - Erlina Nasution, for example, see this bill as a mirror PRT government's failure to capture social conditions of the society. The reason, not the service user wishes to employ domestic workers are children under 18 years old, but more due to the very abundance of children who need a job.
"In the villages, the majority of parents do not send their children to school. Many children who just graduated from elementary school have been asked their parents to work. With such minimal education, they want to work anything other than a housemaid? "Said the leader of Al Muslim Educational Institutions, Sidoarjo, the Friday (14 / 5).
According to this professor, State University of Surabaya, if the government wants to implement the Bill, they should look in the mirror on his responsibility first. "Has the government menggratiskan education through high school? Just graduated from high school, right, is still 15 years old? "He said.
As reported, this time the House was discussing the bill PRT. One of the provisions that are considered worrisome is the minimum age limits and penalties for violators of domestic workers.
Domestic workers are allowed to work at least 18 years old. Those who employ domestic workers under the age of 18 years could be imposed the maximum penalty 5 years imprisonment and maximum fine of Rp 500 million. The threat was contained in article 139 PRT bill.
In addition, criminal threats lurking also employers who do not give awards to his domestic workers. Threat, a maximum of three years in prison and compensation of Rp 50 million to $ 250 million.
The same opinion delivered one of his employers in East Java, Herman Halim. She admitted that Bill was talking about something that is ideal, namely that children under age are not allowed to be employed.
"But the government also needs to consider that the rate of unemployment and poverty, we are also still high," he said, Friday (14 / 5).
According to him, should idealisame in employment in the country is gradually applied by considering other aspects.
Herman explained, basically for PRT service users actually it is pointless to use workers under the age of 18 years. Only, the consideration being undertaken by the relevant community is to help give him a job. "Is not many of us that the concept helps. This child had dropouts. At home because it was not productive to burden his family who also mediocre. Therefore there are usually people who memperkerjakannya. So its even more on reducing unemployment, "he said.
This, he argued, should be distinguished from its context and the practice of employing minors in foreign countries. In these developed countries, according to her, consideration has more on efforts to low wages and also minimize the liability of the financier.
"But if in Indonesia, could be instead that employ most of the loss calculation. Because the pay is relatively equal, a skill he is less able than more experienced, "he said.
Meanwhile, on the part of the pro to the protection of workers under the age also does not necessarily support the PRT will be the enactment of this Act. The unclear definition of the term "minors" to be the cause. "I personally agree that children under the age should be protected from potential employed. But the confusion is the definition of 'under age' is concretely how, "said the frozen food entrepreneur, Johan Suryadarma.
According to Johan, there was some confusion in Indonesia about the restrictions under the age itself. "In the application of Driving License (SIM) I understand that minimum limit of 17 years. In my reading of this bill PRT 18-year limit. Yet the same issues related to (PRT), in Thailand and Vietnam have been referring to the international rules that limit to 16 years. This is exactly how? "He asked.
Johan demanded that the government would align itself with the rule that has been accepted internationally. This, lanjutya, so that the rationale of the Act to be applied more accountable. "Kan weird Indonesian suppose disidak (sudden operation) by the international labor institutions, such as in Thailand and Vietnam two years ago, there were rules that are not the same. They wear limit 16 epidemic, are we 18 years. It would be ridiculous, "he explained.
Funny thing is, head of the Office of Manpower Singapore, Imam Syafii, even claimed not to know this bill. "I still do not know the contents of the bill was good but if it's regulated," said Imam Syafii,
Pesan Hotel - Erlina Nasution, for example, see this bill as a mirror PRT government's failure to capture social conditions of the society. The reason, not the service user wishes to employ domestic workers are children under 18 years old, but more due to the very abundance of children who need a job.
"In the villages, the majority of parents do not send their children to school. Many children who just graduated from elementary school have been asked their parents to work. With such minimal education, they want to work anything other than a housemaid? "Said the leader of Al Muslim Educational Institutions, Sidoarjo, the Friday (14 / 5).
According to this professor, State University of Surabaya, if the government wants to implement the Bill, they should look in the mirror on his responsibility first. "Has the government menggratiskan education through high school? Just graduated from high school, right, is still 15 years old? "He said.
As reported, this time the House was discussing the bill PRT. One of the provisions that are considered worrisome is the minimum age limits and penalties for violators of domestic workers.
Domestic workers are allowed to work at least 18 years old. Those who employ domestic workers under the age of 18 years could be imposed the maximum penalty 5 years imprisonment and maximum fine of Rp 500 million. The threat was contained in article 139 PRT bill.
In addition, criminal threats lurking also employers who do not give awards to his domestic workers. Threat, a maximum of three years in prison and compensation of Rp 50 million to $ 250 million.
The same opinion delivered one of his employers in East Java, Herman Halim. She admitted that Bill was talking about something that is ideal, namely that children under age are not allowed to be employed.
"But the government also needs to consider that the rate of unemployment and poverty, we are also still high," he said, Friday (14 / 5).
According to him, should idealisame in employment in the country is gradually applied by considering other aspects.
Herman explained, basically for PRT service users actually it is pointless to use workers under the age of 18 years. Only, the consideration being undertaken by the relevant community is to help give him a job. "Is not many of us that the concept helps. This child had dropouts. At home because it was not productive to burden his family who also mediocre. Therefore there are usually people who memperkerjakannya. So its even more on reducing unemployment, "he said.
This, he argued, should be distinguished from its context and the practice of employing minors in foreign countries. In these developed countries, according to her, consideration has more on efforts to low wages and also minimize the liability of the financier.
"But if in Indonesia, could be instead that employ most of the loss calculation. Because the pay is relatively equal, a skill he is less able than more experienced, "he said.
Meanwhile, on the part of the pro to the protection of workers under the age also does not necessarily support the PRT will be the enactment of this Act. The unclear definition of the term "minors" to be the cause. "I personally agree that children under the age should be protected from potential employed. But the confusion is the definition of 'under age' is concretely how, "said the frozen food entrepreneur, Johan Suryadarma.
According to Johan, there was some confusion in Indonesia about the restrictions under the age itself. "In the application of Driving License (SIM) I understand that minimum limit of 17 years. In my reading of this bill PRT 18-year limit. Yet the same issues related to (PRT), in Thailand and Vietnam have been referring to the international rules that limit to 16 years. This is exactly how? "He asked.
Johan demanded that the government would align itself with the rule that has been accepted internationally. This, lanjutya, so that the rationale of the Act to be applied more accountable. "Kan weird Indonesian suppose disidak (sudden operation) by the international labor institutions, such as in Thailand and Vietnam two years ago, there were rules that are not the same. They wear limit 16 epidemic, are we 18 years. It would be ridiculous, "he explained.
Funny thing is, head of the Office of Manpower Singapore, Imam Syafii, even claimed not to know this bill. "I still do not know the contents of the bill was good but if it's regulated," said Imam Syafii,
Lowongan BUMN
![Lowongan BUMN]()
Reviewed by Bonita
on
9:03:00 AM
Rating:
No comments: